FUNDAMENTALS OF AUDITING ACC311

Lecture 04
Lesson 04

OBJECTIVE AND GENERAL
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING

AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS 

Objective of an Audit:

Objective of an audit of
financial statements is to enable an auditor to express an opinion whether the

financial statements are
prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an identified financial
reporting

framework (e.g.
International or Local Accounting Standards).

The terms used to
express the opinion are “give a true and fair view” or “present fairly in all
material

respects”.

Benefit of opinion

It improves credibility
of financial statements.

What an opinion does not
achieve?

It does not provide any
assurance about  

i) Future viability of
the entity; and

ii) Efficiency or
effectiveness of management.

General Principles of an
Audit:

Professional Ethics 

There are a number of
ethical matters that are extremely important for auditors to consider when

performing their work.
It is vital to the public image and credibility of the profession that the

auditor is seen to be
behaving in an acceptable manner in addition to actually complying with the

ethical requirements.

It is important to
recognize that many groups in society rely on accountant’s work, not just the

shareholders on whose
behalf the accountant is working. The accountant therefore has a public

accountability.

In the light of this,
ICAP’s ethical guidelines emphasis the following key points about the

characteristics of
accountants:

a)

Independence: 

 Auditor is
independent of management i.e. he is not under the control or influence of

management. 

b)

Integrity: 

Auditor is honest and is
not corrupt. He is straight forward in performing his professional

work 

c)

Objectivity: 

He obtains the evidence
needed to form an opinion and his opinion is based on that

evidence alone. He is
not subjective in forming his opinion. 

d)

Professional Competence
and Due Care:

Auditor has attained
certain professional qualification, has acquired the requisite skill and

has attained the
experience necessary for the audit and performs his work with planning

and due diligence. 

e)

Confidentiality: 

 Auditor neither
discloses the information obtained during the course of his audit without 

permission of his client
(except when required in a court of law) nor uses that information

himself.  

f)

Professional
Behavior: 

 He should not only
act in a professional manner but should also appear to be a 

professional. He should
maintain his professional knowledge and skill at a level required to 

ensure that a client or
employer receives the benefit of competent professional service

based on up-to-date
developments in auditing practice and relevant legislation. 

g)

Technical
Standards: 

 Audit should be
performed by following certain standards, international or national. 

9

  

International Standards
on Auditing (ISAs)

The auditor should
follow basic principles and essential procedures together with related guidance

as contained in ISAs.

International Standards
on Auditing (ISAs) are issued by the International Auditing Practices

Committee (IAPC). The
IAPC is a standing committee of the Council of the International

Federation of
Accountants (IFAC), which was formed in 1977 and is based in New York. IFAC

has more than 150 member
bodies, representing over 2 million accountants in more than 100

countries, and
membership of IFAC automatically confers  

The IAPC issued
standards and statements on auditing and related services in order to improve
the

degree of uniformity of
auditing practice and related services throughout the world.

The IAPC works closely
with its members and national standard setters in order to gain acceptance

of international
Standards of Auditing (ISAs). Member bodies have increasingly sought to align
the

national position with
the international positions IFAC and the IASC have gained influence and

recognition. Standard
setters increasingly refer to the international position in their consultative

documents as
authoritative support for a particular view. 

International auditing
and accounting standards do not at present override local regulations.

Neither IFAC nor the
IASC can currently compel any organization to comply with international

standards; nor are there
specific sanctions where organizations claim to have complied with

international standards,
but have not done so. 

The preface to
International Standards on Auditing and Related Services (ISA 100) states that
IAPC guidance

falls into two
categories: 

 International
Standards on Auditing (ISAs).  

ISAs contain basic
principles and essential procedures (identified in bold type black lettering),

together with related
guidance in the form of explanatory and other material (in plain type)

including appendices.

The basic principles and
essential procedures are to be understood and applied in the context of

explanatory and other
material that provides guidance for their application. The text of a whole

standard is considered
in order to understand and apply the basic principles and essential

procedures. 

 International
Auditing Practice Statements (IAPSs). 

In conducting an audit
in accordance with ISAs, the auditor is also aware of and considers

International Auditing
Practice Statements (IAPSs) applicable to the audit engagement.

IAPSs provide practical
assistance to auditors in implementing standards and promote good

practice. They are not
intended to have the authority of standards.

The auditor may also
conduct the audit in accordance with both ISAs and auditing standards of a
specific jurisdiction 

or country.

 Professional
Skepticism 

The audit should be
planned and performed with an attitude of professional skepticism i.e. forming

an opinion only after
obtaining sufficient and appropriate audit evidence instead of blindly

accepting any
information or explanation given by the management.

An attitude of
professional skepticism means the auditor makes a critical assessment, with a

questioning mind, of the
validity of audit evidence obtained and is alert to audit evidence that

contradicts or brings
into question the reliability of documents and responses to inquiries and other

information obtained
from management and those charged with governance.

SCOPE OF AN AUDIT

What does it
mean?  

 The term “scope of
an audit” refers to the audit procedures that, in the auditor’s judgment and

based on the ISAs, are
deemed appropriate in the circumstances to achieve the objective of the

audit. 

10

  

 Audit
opinion 

 Reasonable
assurance 

 Sufficient
appropriate audit evidence 

 Audit procedures
(based on ISAs)

Audit-Evidence: 

It is obtained by
applying necessary audit procedures. Audit procedures should be based on
requirements of

ISAs, relevant
professional bodies, legislation, regulations, and the terms of the audit
engagement and

reporting
requirements. 

Auditing is concerned
with the verification of accounting date and with determining the accuracy and

reliability of accounting
statements and reports.

Verification does not
mean seeking proof or absolute certainty in connection with the data and
reports

being audited. It means
looking for sufficient evidence depends on what experience and knowledge of

contemporary auditing
standards tells one is satisfactory.

An auditor obtains audit
evidence regarding management’s assertions for the following areas:

a. Existence: an asset
or liability exists at the Balance Sheet date. This is an obvious assertion
with such 

items as land and
buildings, stocks and others

b. Rights and
obligations: an asset or liability pertains to the entity at the Balance Sheet
date. This 

means that the
enterprise has for example ownership of an asset. Ownership as an idea is not
simple

and there may be all
sorts of rights and obligations connected with a given asset or
liability. 

c. Occurrence: a
transaction or event took place which pertains to the enterprise during the
relevant

period. It may be
possible for false transactions (e.g. sales or purchases) to be recorded. The
assertion is

that all recorded
transactions actually took place. 

d. Completeness: there
are not unrecorded assets, liabilities, transactions or events or undisclosed
items.

This is important for
all accounts items but is especially important for liabilities. 

e. Valuation: an asset
or liability is recorded at an appropriate carrying value Appropriate may mean
in

accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, the companies Act rules, Accounting

Standards requirements
and consistent with statements of accounting policies consistently
applied. 

f. Measurement: a
transaction or event is recorded at the proper amount and revenue or expense

allocated to the proper
period. 

g. Presentation and
disclosure: an item is disclosed, classified and described in accordance with

applicable reporting
framework. For example fixed assets are subject to the Companies Ordinance
rules

and to IAS 16. 

An example:

We will look at an item
in a balance sheet, bank overdraft Rs. 10,250. In reporting this item in the
balance

sheet, the directors are
making these assertions:

a. That there is a
liability to the company’s bankers.

b. That at the balance
sheet date this liability was Rs. 10,250.

c. That this amount is
agreed by the bank  

d. That the overdraft
was repayable on demand. If this were not so, it would not appear amongst the

current liabilities and
terms would be stated. 

e. That the overdraft
was not secured. If it were secured this fact would need to be stated.

f. That the company has
the Authority to borrow from its Memorandum and Articles.

g. That a bank
reconciliation statement can be prepared.

h. That the bank is
willing to let the overdraft continue.

If no item ‘bank
overdraft’ appeared in the balance sheet, it would represent an assertion by
the directors

that no overdraft
liability existed at the balance sheet date.

REASONABLE ASSURANCE

What is reasonable
assurance? 

A conclusion that the
financial statements are not materially misstated. An auditor cannot obtain
absolute

assurance because of
limitations described in Para below.

How reasonable assurance
is achieved?

It is achieved by
obtaining audit evidence.

Factors affecting
reasonable assurance 

11

  

i) Inherent limitation
of an audit, i.e. failure of audit procedures to detect material

misstatements in
financial statements because of:

a) The use of testing
(application of procedures on samples).

b) The inherent
limitations of accounting and internal control system.

c) Persuasive nature of
audit evidence rather than conclusive (Persuasive: one leading 

to an opinion; one which
causes to believe; Conclusive: final, convincing).

ii) Exercise of judgment
by the auditor in gathering of evidence and drawing of conclusion.

iii) Existence of other
limitations like related parties etc. 

Audit Risk and
Materiality

Guidance provided by ISA
200 in this matter is discussed in later chapters which specifically and
exclusively

discuss it. 

Responsibility for the
Financial Statements:

Responsibilities for
preparing and presenting the financial statements are that of management.
Auditor’s

responsibility is to
express an opinion thereon. 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *